1. SPS Accounts:
    Do you find yourself coming back time after time? Do you appreciate the ongoing hard work to keep this community focused and successful in its mission? Please consider supporting us by upgrading to an SPS Account. Besides the warm and fuzzy feeling that comes from supporting a good cause, you'll also get a significant number of ever-expanding perks and benefits on the site and the forums. Click here to find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You are currently viewing Boards o' Magick as a guest, but you can register an account here. Registration is fast, easy and free. Once registered you will have access to search the forums, create and respond to threads, PM other members, upload screenshots and access many other features unavailable to guests.

BoM cultivates a friendly and welcoming atmosphere. We have been aiming for quality over quantity with our forums from their inception, and believe that this distinction is truly tangible and valued by our members. We'd love to have you join us today!

(If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you've forgotten your username or password, click here.)

Warm up the bribes.

Discussion in 'Alley of Lingering Sighs' started by pplr, Jan 21, 2010.

  1. pplr Gems: 18/31
    Latest gem: Horn Coral


    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2008
    Messages:
    1,032
    Media:
    2
    Likes Received:
    35
    This can be a bad thing IMO.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34822247/ns/politics-supreme_court/

    I would like to see an option for (near) total public funding for candidates for election rather than the loophole laden election laws we have today for the ways candidates get campaign money.

    But making the laws we do have fewer and/or weaker doesn't strike me as improving the situation at all.

    And for anyone that says they don't want to fund the campaign of a candidates you don't like, I'd ask if you have ever heard of the "Graft Tax".

    That is the amount of money citizens have to pay, through the government, for various favors, special contracts, special tax credits/cuts/loopholes, and so on to groups and individuals that bribed elected officials via campaign fundraising.
     
  2. Aldeth the Foppish Idiot

    Aldeth the Foppish Idiot Armed with My Mallet O' Thinking Veteran

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    12,434
    Media:
    46
    Likes Received:
    250
    Gender:
    Male
    I saw this story earlier and thought the same thing - that it's likely bad. Upon thinking on it a bit more though, there were private groups running smear campaigns already. Remember the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth in 2004, and the Mormon crusade against Prop 8 in 2008? In both cases the private groups did more to smear the candidate/issue that the actual opponents ever would have. So while I do find it concerning, I'm not as concerned as I initially was.
     
  3. dmc

    dmc Speak softly and carry a big briefcase Staff Member Distinguished Member ★ SPS Account Holder Resourceful Adored Veteran New Server Contributor [2012] (for helping Sorcerer's Place lease a new, more powerful server!)

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2001
    Messages:
    8,731
    Media:
    88
    Likes Received:
    379
    Gender:
    Male
    Yeah, I remember when the SC decided to take this case and opened a special session to hear arguments. We knew that they were going to significantly broaden the scope of the issues presented and that the conservatives were just itching to get rid of some things they didn't like. I love Scalia's double-speak "The censorship we now confront is vast in its reach" -- what a crock.

    However, I'm not sure that this is really going to change all that much, as there were so many ways around the laws as they stood anyway.
     
  4. The Great Snook Gems: 31/31
    Latest gem: Rogue Stone


    Adored Veteran

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    4,123
    Media:
    28
    Likes Received:
    313
    Gender:
    Male
    I agree, although I would have mentioned moveon.org, ACORN, SEIU, etc. instead :D
     
  5. NOG (No Other Gods)

    NOG (No Other Gods) Going to church doesn't make you a Christian

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    4,883
    Media:
    8
    Likes Received:
    148
    Gender:
    Male
    On the one hand, I agree with others that this likely won't improve the situation any. On the other hand, given the grounds of the challenge, I don't really see the Court having any other choice (thus I don't really understand the 4 dissenters). As long as corporate entities are given similar rights to citizens, they also have similar freedoms, including Freedom of Speech. If private individuals can do it, corporations should be able to, as well. God help us all.
     
  6. Chandos the Red

    Chandos the Red This Wheel's on Fire

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2003
    Messages:
    8,252
    Media:
    82
    Likes Received:
    238
    Gender:
    Male
    I would love for someone to explain that. It makes no sense. Hopefully you can add some clarity.
     
  7. Aldeth the Foppish Idiot

    Aldeth the Foppish Idiot Armed with My Mallet O' Thinking Veteran

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    12,434
    Media:
    46
    Likes Received:
    250
    Gender:
    Male
    I wonder why the judges that voted for this change aren't getting the "activist" label? This is about the most activist decision we have seen in decades, and is basically legislating from the bench. I know activist judges are usually associated with liberals, but this was a conservative issue that was voted on by the conservative members of the court.
     
  8. Chandos the Red

    Chandos the Red This Wheel's on Fire

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2003
    Messages:
    8,252
    Media:
    82
    Likes Received:
    238
    Gender:
    Male
    Just wait till insterets in China, Iran and North Korea set up Proxy corps in the US and start taking out political ads. That will change things pretty quick. Conservatives are crowing right now, but wait till their political enemies start up the ad machine with high-sounding American names in the ads. Most large corporations are multi-national affairs. These boobs have given Constitutional rights to anything on the planet that calls itself a "corporation." What fools they are....
     
  9. NOG (No Other Gods)

    NOG (No Other Gods) Going to church doesn't make you a Christian

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    4,883
    Media:
    8
    Likes Received:
    148
    Gender:
    Male
    It evolved from the original corporations, which were basically just joint ventures. Instead of having one person own each item, they allowed for a kind of 'corporate ownership', in which all members shared ownership. From there, I think it just expanded. If people can own as a joint entity, shouldn't they be able to act as one, to gather money as one, to speak as one, etc?

    Again, I don't see this as activist judging at all. It's a basic application of rights, only confused by the issue that it's a corporation claiming them. How formally enshrined in law corporate rights are, I don't know, but given them, it's a logical conclusion.

    I haven't heard any conservatives crowing yet. Then again, all the news I see is about Brown and Health Care. Care to link?
     
  10. crucis

    crucis Fighting the undead in Selune's name Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    977
    Likes Received:
    29
    IIRC, legally speaking, a corporation is treated as an "individual". Though if that's true, then it'd seem to me that a corp should have the same contribution limits as any private individual.
     
  11. Chandos the Red

    Chandos the Red This Wheel's on Fire

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2003
    Messages:
    8,252
    Media:
    82
    Likes Received:
    238
    Gender:
    Male
    Corporations are not natural born citizens, and they don't speak as one. Already shareholders, some of whom are Democrats, Republicans, liberals, conservatives, moderates, are demanding that THEY vote on which political parties corporations should support. And customers: Those Corporations do business with all kinds of people. I have already started notifying the companies I do business with that as a customer, I demand that they support my policial views in their ads, since I help pay their bills. And I'm sure conservatives will be doing the same thing now. What foolishness.

    Sure:
    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/politics_nation/2010/01/who_won_lost_supreme_court.html
     
  12. crucis

    crucis Fighting the undead in Selune's name Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    977
    Likes Received:
    29

    Actually, I think that it was "activist" to deny corporations the same rights as individuals in the first place.
     
  13. Aldeth the Foppish Idiot

    Aldeth the Foppish Idiot Armed with My Mallet O' Thinking Veteran

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    12,434
    Media:
    46
    Likes Received:
    250
    Gender:
    Male
    A possibility I had not even considered until you brought it up.

    One would think so, but that doesn't appear to be the case.
     
  14. Chandos the Red

    Chandos the Red This Wheel's on Fire

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2003
    Messages:
    8,252
    Media:
    82
    Likes Received:
    238
    Gender:
    Male
    Can you explain this? A corporation is not an American citizen, and while a citizen doesn't have to be born here, he/she has to make the requirments set by the US law.

    Here are the requiements to be a citizen of the US:

    http://immigration.findlaw.com/immi...&HBX_PK=us+citizenship+requirements&HBX_OU=50
     
  15. crucis

    crucis Fighting the undead in Selune's name Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    977
    Likes Received:
    29

    How typically liberal. :rolleyes:

    I did NOT say that corps were "citizens". I said that I think that corps are treated as "individuals", legally speaking.
     
    T2Bruno likes this.
  16. Drew

    Drew Arrogant, contemptible, and obnoxious Adored Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2005
    Messages:
    3,605
    Media:
    6
    Likes Received:
    190
    Gender:
    Male
    How utterly black and white.
    ...and I'm pretty sure you just ignored Chandos' point by playing semantics. Just as corporations do not fit the the requirements to be a citizen of the US, they also do not meet the requirements to be a legal Alien. Chandos' larger argument is that corporations should not be accorded the same rights enjoyed by us living, breathing human beings. Agree or disagree, but at least respond to his actual argument.
     
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2010
  17. NOG (No Other Gods)

    NOG (No Other Gods) Going to church doesn't make you a Christian

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    4,883
    Media:
    8
    Likes Received:
    148
    Gender:
    Male
    Chandos, thanks for the link. Those people are idiots, but it's Congress so what do you expect.

    Drew, Chandos was actually playing semantics first, so I consider Crucis's stab fair game. No one ever said they were citizens, or legal aliens, or illegal aliens, or any of those things. They're corporations. And, apparently, US law treats corporations as individuals. Does that mean they have the same rights as a US citizen? God I hope not. All we need is corporations voting themselves to really straighten up the electoral system. What it seems to mean is that they are capable of having rights, just like any other individual of any type.

    The term 'corporate individual' may seem like an oxymoron (or a term from The Exorcist:evil:), but this is law we're talking about. :confused:

    As for the rights a corporation should have, I'd say all the same property rights as a citizen, but none of the political/legal rights (meaning no Right to Remain Silent). Which way spending your money on political ads falls? Well, I don't know.
     
  18. Drew

    Drew Arrogant, contemptible, and obnoxious Adored Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2005
    Messages:
    3,605
    Media:
    6
    Likes Received:
    190
    Gender:
    Male
    Fair enough, NOG, but I'm still inclined to agree with Chandos that corporations enjoy far more privileges than they probably should. By the looks of things, we'd probably share a lot of common ground issue, too.
     
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2010
  19. NOG (No Other Gods)

    NOG (No Other Gods) Going to church doesn't make you a Christian

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    4,883
    Media:
    8
    Likes Received:
    148
    Gender:
    Male
    ... Wait, what? Huh? :confused: How many of you are there in there?

    If you meant, "You'd probably share a lot of common ground with us on this issue", I suspect we'd agree on a lot and disagree on a lot.
     
  20. Drew

    Drew Arrogant, contemptible, and obnoxious Adored Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2005
    Messages:
    3,605
    Media:
    6
    Likes Received:
    190
    Gender:
    Male
    It depends on whether I'm having one of my "episodes". As many as 14, but usually just 3. Anyway, thanks, I fixed my post.
     
Sorcerer's Place is a project run entirely by fans and for fans. Maintaining Sorcerer's Place and a stable environment for all our hosted sites requires a substantial amount of our time and funds on a regular basis, so please consider supporting us to keep the site up & running smoothly. Thank you!

Sorcerers.net is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.