1. SPS Accounts:
    Do you find yourself coming back time after time? Do you appreciate the ongoing hard work to keep this community focused and successful in its mission? Please consider supporting us by upgrading to an SPS Account. Besides the warm and fuzzy feeling that comes from supporting a good cause, you'll also get a significant number of ever-expanding perks and benefits on the site and the forums. Click here to find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You are currently viewing Boards o' Magick as a guest, but you can register an account here. Registration is fast, easy and free. Once registered you will have access to search the forums, create and respond to threads, PM other members, upload screenshots and access many other features unavailable to guests.

BoM cultivates a friendly and welcoming atmosphere. We have been aiming for quality over quantity with our forums from their inception, and believe that this distinction is truly tangible and valued by our members. We'd love to have you join us today!

(If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you've forgotten your username or password, click here.)

Why not Wizard Slayers?

Discussion in 'BG2: Throne of Bhaal (Classic)' started by Chelsea, Jul 20, 2006.

  1. Chelsea Gems: 8/31
    Latest gem: Skydrop


    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2000
    Messages:
    250
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] Having only recently rejoined the board I have noticed in many older posts that people seem to really have a problem regarding Wizard Slayers.

    Now I realise that they are severely restricted with regards to their useable items but I have seen the terms - "useless" and "worthless" used to describe them.

    So what's the beef. Are they just 'hard work' or truly a waste of speace in your mind?

    Or is their only hope dualing with thief to get UAI? :cool:
     
  2. Aldeth the Foppish Idiot

    Aldeth the Foppish Idiot Armed with My Mallet O' Thinking Veteran

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    12,434
    Media:
    46
    Likes Received:
    250
    Gender:
    Male
    Well, I think the main problem people have with Wizard Slayers is the restrictions on equipment, and the fact that you actually have to hit the enemy spellcaster in order to get the % chance of disrupting the spell. With most mages, the toughest task is taking down their defenses. Once that is accomplished they usually fall quickly. So that problem isn't disrupting their spellcasting, it's hitting them in the first place. Because of this more people would prefer a character that specializes in taking down enemy defenses (like an Iquisitor). Since Keldorn is one of the most popular NPCs, having both him and a Wizard Slayer in the party is superfulous.

    That having been said, I do see two types of encounters where a Wizard Slayer has a great deal of usefulness: liches (especially the demi-lich) and dragons. The demi-lich's spells will fail repeatedly with a Wizard Slayer, as will dragon's spells. With dragons, this is especially useful against ToB dragons which have a habit of casting heal when they get badly hurt.
     
  3. Caradhras

    Caradhras I may be bad... but I feel gooood! Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2004
    Messages:
    4,111
    Media:
    99
    Likes Received:
    104
    Gender:
    Male
    Wizard Slayer/Thief DC is one of the most powerful option in that game, with UAI it has no drawback at all.

    I like Wizard Slayers even if they're not dualled, true they're harder to play but the payoffs are really good. It is important to remember that their special attack only works with melee attacks so it's a good idea to get as many as possible (e.g. dual wielding or using weapons such as Belm or Kundane).

    I think their bad rep is due to the fact that most people can't be bothered with the limitation on magic items. I can understand that, although I tried I really didn't like to play a Kensai because of the armour restriction...
     
  4. Chelsea Gems: 8/31
    Latest gem: Skydrop


    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2000
    Messages:
    250
    Likes Received:
    0
    Friend of mine keeps convincing me that WS's rock but all I have ever seen on here is negatives.

    Glad for the two considered opinions above.

    According to my friend he has a WS with FOA and Belm dualed. He makes up the frontline with Keldorn. In two weeks he has gone from Chateau Irenicus to Draconis and says that no-one has been a huge problem once he has brought the two fighters to bear.

    Which did make me wonder as to why they had such a bad wrap.

    I guess it is that old thing "hard to do, but ultimately very rewarding".

    P.S. Imagine a two-handed sword wieldig Wizard Slayer/Thief with Carsomyr in hand...YIKES! :D
     
  5. Caradhras

    Caradhras I may be bad... but I feel gooood! Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2004
    Messages:
    4,111
    Media:
    99
    Likes Received:
    104
    Gender:
    Male
    It's been done before! ;)
     
  6. Aldeth the Foppish Idiot

    Aldeth the Foppish Idiot Armed with My Mallet O' Thinking Veteran

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    12,434
    Media:
    46
    Likes Received:
    250
    Gender:
    Male
    The other thing is that most people that DC fighter-types with thieves go with a Kensai thief combo, as UAI also eliminates nearly all of their disadvantages as well.
     
  7. Clixby Gems: 13/31
    Latest gem: Ziose


    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    566
    Likes Received:
    1
    Jesus Herbert Walker Christ. Why didn't I ever think of that?
     
  8. Caradhras

    Caradhras I may be bad... but I feel gooood! Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2004
    Messages:
    4,111
    Media:
    99
    Likes Received:
    104
    Gender:
    Male
    Because not using magic items (while being able to use magical weapons and armours) is not as damaging as not being able to wear armours or bracers or helmets?
    Critical hits are a pain with a Kensai... :D
     
  9. gatsbygoon Gems: 5/31
    Latest gem: Andar


    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    0
    A WS doesn't have to deal damage to get the miscast effect. They are extremely useful given that stoneskin is one of the most widely used and annoying spells in the game.
     
  10. Die_Bad_Guys Gems: 4/31
    Latest gem: Sunstone


    Joined:
    May 19, 2006
    Messages:
    91
    Likes Received:
    0
    PFMW is a bigger problem then SS
     
  11. Klorox

    Klorox Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-mênu! Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2003
    Messages:
    2,980
    Likes Received:
    7
    Crits ain't too bad for Kensai... an Ioun Stone protects 'em too!
     
  12. Abdel - Bhaal Spawn Gems: 13/31
    Latest gem: Ziose


    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2005
    Messages:
    561
    Likes Received:
    0
    PFMW can be taken care of by a non-magical weapon. I always carry a club just for that reason.
     
  13. Klorox

    Klorox Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-mênu! Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2003
    Messages:
    2,980
    Likes Received:
    7
    Seriously, Abdel?

    Not just a regular, unenchanted longsword (or whatever)?

    I think that's pretty cool, actually. :)
     
  14. Felinoid

    Felinoid Who did the what now?

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2005
    Messages:
    7,470
    Likes Received:
    6
    Gender:
    Male
    I've heard that, and it is how it's supposed to be, but for some reason I doubt that it works that way. I've seen more than a few high-level creatures that only have a single immunity affect, and I doubt that any are immune to +2 weapons but not +1 or normal.
     
  15. Luiz Gems: 5/31
    Latest gem: Andar


    Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2005
    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    2
    edit: opps
     
  16. Rudiger Gems: 3/31
    Latest gem: Lynx Eye


    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2004
    Messages:
    65
    Likes Received:
    0
    I found that playing a wizard slayer is a good way to find out how many of your enemys use really force spell.
     
  17. The Magpie

    The Magpie Balance, in all things Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,300
    Likes Received:
    25
    Gender:
    Male
    Normal weapons can hit enemy wizards protected by PFMW. The difficulty is with enemies who are already immune to unenchanted weaponry casting it (e.g. Maraliths). Generally, though, it's just easier to use Breach. Rayic Gethras is the only encounter I can recall where I've consistently used the normal weapons trick to get through his defences.
     
  18. Klorox

    Klorox Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-mênu! Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2003
    Messages:
    2,980
    Likes Received:
    7
    As Maggie say, Fel, it does work. I also always carry unenchanted weapons with me.
     
  19. Chelsea Gems: 8/31
    Latest gem: Skydrop


    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2000
    Messages:
    250
    Likes Received:
    0
    Like magpie I tend to find that enemies with PFMW are also immune to normal weapons. Such as Liches, Demons etc.

    And then of course we have demi-liches which I think are immune to breach as they are immune to lower than Lvl 6 spells.

    Many I time I have been flailing away at a demi-lich waiting for PFMW to run out.
     
  20. Drew

    Drew Arrogant, contemptible, and obnoxious Adored Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2005
    Messages:
    3,605
    Media:
    6
    Likes Received:
    190
    Gender:
    Male
    A simple turn undead works against liches just fine. I usually save my Protection from Magic scrolls for demiliches. I don't use them to protect my tanks, though. I use them on the demi-lich. (It's also a great way to beat Kuroisan.)
     
Sorcerer's Place is a project run entirely by fans and for fans. Maintaining Sorcerer's Place and a stable environment for all our hosted sites requires a substantial amount of our time and funds on a regular basis, so please consider supporting us to keep the site up & running smoothly. Thank you!

Sorcerers.net is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.