1. SPS Accounts:
    Do you find yourself coming back time after time? Do you appreciate the ongoing hard work to keep this community focused and successful in its mission? Please consider supporting us by upgrading to an SPS Account. Besides the warm and fuzzy feeling that comes from supporting a good cause, you'll also get a significant number of ever-expanding perks and benefits on the site and the forums. Click here to find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You are currently viewing Boards o' Magick as a guest, but you can register an account here. Registration is fast, easy and free. Once registered you will have access to search the forums, create and respond to threads, PM other members, upload screenshots and access many other features unavailable to guests.

BoM cultivates a friendly and welcoming atmosphere. We have been aiming for quality over quantity with our forums from their inception, and believe that this distinction is truly tangible and valued by our members. We'd love to have you join us today!

(If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you've forgotten your username or password, click here.)

Wizard dual classing / party of 2 question

Discussion in 'Icewind Dale 2' started by kyle311, Nov 23, 2002.

  1. kyle311 Gems: 1/31
    Latest gem: Turquoise


    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2002
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] Does being a specialist wizard count as being a wizard? So an elf advancing as a necromancer is still advancing in their favored class? If you want to be an elf transmuter/rogue and have to keep your classes together, then they totally botched IWD2.

    Also, I'm going to make a party of 2. What do you think is the best combo? Do you think they both need rogue 2 for improved evasion? I was thinking about a R3/F4/Wx (or Sx) and a Monk-x/Cleric-x or a F4/B5/Cx... what do you think? Also what weapons do you think they should focus in?
     
  2. teekc Gems: 23/31
    Latest gem: Black Opal


    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2002
    Messages:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    0
    it is the specific wizard class, not wizards in general. so, if you have a male drow with x necromancer/ x+2 ranger, you take xp penalty.

    i think my playing habit is different from your playing style so my suggestion might not be working for you. i don't think you need both with rogue level. you only need one of them with some rogue level if you feel like to de-trap. if you don't think de-trap and lockpick is not that important (you might miss some good stuff if you have problem lockpick), you can totally forget about taking rogue. if i were to play duet, i will take something like cleric (mask, for mirror image) 20/ fighter 10 and sorcerer 25/ rogue 5. but then that is me, not you. the reason i need so much level in spellcasting is because i play with summons all the time. i rarely have use for my fighters. and of course, with this kind of combination, i will have a very very hard start.
     
  3. Modjahed Gems: 14/31
    Latest gem: Chrysoberyl


    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2000
    Messages:
    620
    Likes Received:
    0
    I suggest the following for your party:

    1) front line - Monk/Cleric - great AC, WIS used by both classes, quite good HP

    2) Sorcerer/Thief - area effect spells, talker, thief skills

    Both will have evasion, and the frontliner can have Improved Evasion at level 9 (monk)
     
Sorcerer's Place is a project run entirely by fans and for fans. Maintaining Sorcerer's Place and a stable environment for all our hosted sites requires a substantial amount of our time and funds on a regular basis, so please consider supporting us to keep the site up & running smoothly. Thank you!

Sorcerers.net is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.