1. SPS Accounts:
    Do you find yourself coming back time after time? Do you appreciate the ongoing hard work to keep this community focused and successful in its mission? Please consider supporting us by upgrading to an SPS Account. Besides the warm and fuzzy feeling that comes from supporting a good cause, you'll also get a significant number of ever-expanding perks and benefits on the site and the forums. Click here to find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You are currently viewing Boards o' Magick as a guest, but you can register an account here. Registration is fast, easy and free. Once registered you will have access to search the forums, create and respond to threads, PM other members, upload screenshots and access many other features unavailable to guests.

BoM cultivates a friendly and welcoming atmosphere. We have been aiming for quality over quantity with our forums from their inception, and believe that this distinction is truly tangible and valued by our members. We'd love to have you join us today!

(If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you've forgotten your username or password, click here.)

Everard +5 vs. Sling of Seeking

Discussion in 'BG2: Shadows of Amn (Classic)' started by Isshy, Apr 24, 2005.

  1. Isshy Gems: 7/31
    Latest gem: Tchazar

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2004
    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    0
    Remove all ads!
    I dont want to double post the same thing but I did a test on the Sling of Seeking vs. the Everard +5 sling. The results are here: http://www.sorcerers.net/ubb/ultimatebb.php?/topic/2/7687.html I wanted to make it a post that people could search for by subject to dispell the myth that The sling of Seeking is better than the Everard +5...it Isn't.

    Maybe someone can answer my PPS question in the post.

    [ April 24, 2005, 09:59: Message edited by: Beren ]
     
    Isshy, Apr 24, 2005
    #1

  2. alterEgo Gems: 1/31
    Latest gem: Turquoise

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2005
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    alterEgo, Apr 25, 2005
    #2

  3. Isshy Gems: 7/31
    Latest gem: Tchazar

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2004
    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes, yours is the post I was looking for but couldn't access. The link must be broken from the search results page. My question is why do they miss more often with higher strength?
     
    Isshy, Apr 25, 2005
    #3

  4. alterEgo Gems: 1/31
    Latest gem: Turquoise

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2005
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    You probably couldn't access the post because it was moved to the Throne of Bhaal section after I mentioned that I had it installed.

    I'm not sure why there would be more misses with higher strength.
     
    alterEgo, Apr 25, 2005
    #4
Sorcerer's Place is a project run entirely by fans and for fans. Maintaining Sorcerer's Place and a stable environment for all our hosted sites requires a substantial amount of our time and funds on a regular basis, so please consider supporting us to keep the site up & running smoothly. Thank you!

Sorcerers.net is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.