1. SPS Accounts:
    Do you find yourself coming back time after time? Do you appreciate the ongoing hard work to keep this community focused and successful in its mission? Please consider supporting us by upgrading to an SPS Account. Besides the warm and fuzzy feeling that comes from supporting a good cause, you'll also get a significant number of ever-expanding perks and benefits on the site and the forums. Click here to find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You are currently viewing Boards o' Magick as a guest, but you can register an account here. Registration is fast, easy and free. Once registered you will have access to search the forums, create and respond to threads, PM other members, upload screenshots and access many other features unavailable to guests.

BoM cultivates a friendly and welcoming atmosphere. We have been aiming for quality over quantity with our forums from their inception, and believe that this distinction is truly tangible and valued by our members. We'd love to have you join us today!

(If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you've forgotten your username or password, click here.)

Inquisitor with 3 INT - did I make a mistake?

Discussion in 'BG2: Shadows of Amn (Classic)' started by Edric_Bayne, Apr 25, 2001.

  1. Edric_Bayne Gems: 1/31
    Latest gem: Turquoise


    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] I just couldn't see a reason to give him any points in INT since he won't be able to cast spells anyways. I just started BG2 and want to make sure I won't regret this later.
    My starting stats:
    STR: 18/00
    DEX: 18
    CON: 18
    INT: 3
    WIS: 16
    CHA: 17
     
  2. Big B Gems: 27/31
    Latest gem: Emerald


    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2001
    Messages:
    2,521
    Likes Received:
    0
    Personally I would never give anybody-not even a stupid half orc barbarian-an Int of 3. But that is preference. Just don't have your character go up and fight a Mind Flayer ;). Why don't you use some of the points from Wisdom and give them to Int to even things out some more, since I'm sure you don't want to lower any of your other stats.
     
  3. Zorac Gems: 11/31
    Latest gem: Bloodstone


    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2000
    Messages:
    412
    Likes Received:
    0
    How many boards did you post this on :)

    Anyway Big B said it all. It's going to be hard to roleplay int 3, but then again that's not what you are doing is it?
     
  4. IronEagle Gems: 13/31
    Latest gem: Ziose


    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2000
    Messages:
    582
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just dont use him to fight mind flayers..

    EDIT: Iron Eagle, Did you even read the previous posts before you responded to this? Here is a perfect example of the type of post to AVOID.

    Big B just said "Just don't have your character go up and fight a Mind Flayer."

    Did you not SEE that??



    [This message has been edited by Darien Noella (edited April 26, 2001).]
     
  5. Edric_Bayne Gems: 1/31
    Latest gem: Turquoise


    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] Ummm... *blushes* I posted it on two boards.

    Ya, I wasn't comfortable about the 3 INT either (from a RP perspective). But what I couldn't see were the gameplay consequences. Now I know. There's at least one creature that can drain your intelligence. And only having 3 INT may mean insta-death versus these creatures.

    Based on this, I'll probably reroll. Thanks all.
     
  6. Enagonios Gems: 31/31
    Latest gem: Rogue Stone


    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2001
    Messages:
    6,089
    Likes Received:
    5
    [​IMG] Naw, don't reroll. You don't have to. Hell, I had a 2 int. ;) I think your stats rock. Fighters only need STR. CON. and DEX. you maxed them and charisma, the next best thing, out. What fighter cares about WIS or INT? It's not like you're gonna solve a puzzle or talk to birds. That's why you've got party members. A Fighter doesn't have to be smart, he has to be a killing machine ;)
     
  7. Edric_Bayne Gems: 1/31
    Latest gem: Turquoise


    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] Update: I rerolled and got an absurdly high total score which allowed me to raise my INT to 10 and only sacrifice a bit of wisdom.

    Now I should be able to beat Minsc occasionally at checkers.
     
  8. Enagonios Gems: 31/31
    Latest gem: Rogue Stone


    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2001
    Messages:
    6,089
    Likes Received:
    5
    You guys try to get high stats too much! :p
    As long as I max out STR DEX and CON I'm okay. of course, CHA helps, but not too much.
    As for wisdom and int <harrumph>! Look at me, I was an uneducated, unworldly, unwise dumbass. It didn't make a diff in swinging the swords ;)
    It's not Minsc you gotta beat, it's boo. Watch out for his CzeckosHamsterian Defense ;)
     
  9. Earl Grey

    Earl Grey Mmm... hot tea! Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2000
    Messages:
    1,933
    Likes Received:
    1
    [​IMG] You could consider lowering the dexterity. Your AC will be fine anyway, so it mostly depends on if you're going to use missile weapons with such a character.

    Rerolling a character who got 18/00 strength is a painful decision, isn't it? :)
     
Sorcerer's Place is a project run entirely by fans and for fans. Maintaining Sorcerer's Place and a stable environment for all our hosted sites requires a substantial amount of our time and funds on a regular basis, so please consider supporting us to keep the site up & running smoothly. Thank you!

Sorcerers.net is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.