1. SPS Accounts:
    Do you find yourself coming back time after time? Do you appreciate the ongoing hard work to keep this community focused and successful in its mission? Please consider supporting us by upgrading to an SPS Account. Besides the warm and fuzzy feeling that comes from supporting a good cause, you'll also get a significant number of ever-expanding perks and benefits on the site and the forums. Click here to find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You are currently viewing Boards o' Magick as a guest, but you can register an account here. Registration is fast, easy and free. Once registered you will have access to search the forums, create and respond to threads, PM other members, upload screenshots and access many other features unavailable to guests.

BoM cultivates a friendly and welcoming atmosphere. We have been aiming for quality over quantity with our forums from their inception, and believe that this distinction is truly tangible and valued by our members. We'd love to have you join us today!

(If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you've forgotten your username or password, click here.)

NFL Officials

Discussion in 'Colosseum' started by iLLusioN', Oct 22, 2006.

  1. iLLusioN' Gems: 16/31
    Latest gem: Shandon


    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2003
    Messages:
    817
    Likes Received:
    3
    OK I really believe that there are some serious problems with the NFL officiating this year.

    Last year I thought the same thing, and this year it's even worse. I've seen some horrible calls over the last few weeks, including the most blatant blow to the head of quarterback that I have ever seen. It wasn't just one person, but 2 people hitting Ben Roethlisberger in the head, one in the back of the head the other in the facemask, can it get any more obvious?

    Also they seem to be missing a whole lot of clips special teams-wise, and pass interference, not to mention holding. I watched the Steelers-Falcons game today, and the Chargers-Cheifs, and in both games the calls seemed to be very very one sided. It has been this way in every game that I have watched this season. Has anyone else noticed this?

    edit: fixed some typos

    [ October 23, 2006, 01:18: Message edited by: LoS_DrIzZt4 ]
     
  2. Aldeth the Foppish Idiot

    Aldeth the Foppish Idiot Armed with My Mallet O' Thinking Veteran

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    12,434
    Media:
    46
    Likes Received:
    250
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes, I agree that the hit on Big Ben was about an as obvious as you are going to get. He was knocked into the defender from behind, but the guy from the front blatantly lead with his head, which is supposed to be against the rules. However, as die-hard of a Steelers fan as I am, that play was not the reason they lost the game - Charlie Batch played well enough. Turnovers killed the Steelers once again - you can't expect to win when you allow 41 points.
     
  3. iLLusioN' Gems: 16/31
    Latest gem: Shandon


    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2003
    Messages:
    817
    Likes Received:
    3
    I didn't say that it lost the game, just that the officiating was horrible. For most of those penalties i was refering to the chiefs game. The chargers just seemed to get hit with the most pathetic calls i've seen since Inianapolis in january last year. Even the announcers were saying something about it.
     
  4. Felinoid

    Felinoid Who did the what now?

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2005
    Messages:
    7,470
    Likes Received:
    6
    Gender:
    Male
    The problem isn't undercalling, or even over-calling, it's inconsistency. It almost seems like they flip a coin before the game over who they're going to call the most penalties on. The Packers-Dolphins game yesterday seemed fair to me, with the part I remember most being those two consecutive penalties at the end of the first half robbing us of a field goal that Raynor made from 55 yards out (not bad for a newbie). But both calls were fair, and in the end we won.

    Much the same thing happens with traffic laws, though there it's a matter of being undermanned, and the luck comes in as to whether a cop spots you. The end result is people going 20 mph over the speed limit and never getting caught, while someone who goes 10 over gets caught. (And no, this isn't sour grapes. I only go 5 over in a place where they only go after 10+ and have never been stopped.)

    One possible solution to this problem is letting them change the penalty calls after the play. If there was something they missed, let them fix it. If they called something they shouldn't, let them fix it. They're only human (at least until the point when we can play on a holodeck or something like that), and we shouldn't treat their penalty calls as if they're infallible. Of course, that leads to a gray area of "should coaches be able to challenge penalties?", but we'll cross that bridge when we come to it.
     
  5. iLLusioN' Gems: 16/31
    Latest gem: Shandon


    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2003
    Messages:
    817
    Likes Received:
    3
    Completelt agree with you Felinoid.

    Some of the calls I've been seeing are completely bone-headed, and in alot of cases one team gets called for it all game, while the other does it, but doesn't get called for it. Holding is a major one on this.

    I don't know how many times I've seen a linebacker come free and a lineman hold to keep him from getting sacked and nothing happens. I remember watching the the Arizona-Chicago game the other night and it was like that, Chicago just couldn't seem to get away with anything, but Arizona seemed to be under the officials radar. Still put out that Arizona handed that game away
     
  6. Aldeth the Foppish Idiot

    Aldeth the Foppish Idiot Armed with My Mallet O' Thinking Veteran

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    12,434
    Media:
    46
    Likes Received:
    250
    Gender:
    Male
    Well, this could happen, but it's only uni-directional. By that I mean that I have seen instances where a penalty flag has been thrown, but after a discussion the officials decide there was no foul, and no penalty is assessed. This happens when more than one official sees a play. If one had a better look than another, and believed no foul occurred, they pick up the flag.

    However, the opposite never happens, and the reason for this is obvious - no one saw the foul. In order for an official to call a foul, he must see it. It's not like the situation of picking up a flag where there is a difference of opinion between two officials. With the 'no-calls' no one saw it in the first place.

    And I agree that it would be very difficult to implement a system that allowed penalties to be reviewed. For starters, plays that are reviewable are also eligible to be challenged by the coach. A further aggrevating factor in the process is that some penalties are judgement calls. Certainly some holding and pass interference calls are obvious, but what do you do in a borderline case? When does a leveraged block turn into a hold? When does incidental contact turn into pass interference? Two different officials can review the same play, and give two different calls.
     
  7. iLLusioN' Gems: 16/31
    Latest gem: Shandon


    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2003
    Messages:
    817
    Likes Received:
    3
    If such a thing would happen I think that it could only be for certain penalties....pass interference, personal fouls, and major clips/holds
     
  8. Felinoid

    Felinoid Who did the what now?

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2005
    Messages:
    7,470
    Likes Received:
    6
    Gender:
    Male
    Aye. Only changing the flagrant stuff would take a lot of heat off of the refs for missed/bad calls.
     
  9. Triactus

    Triactus United we stand, divided we fall Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Messages:
    1,696
    Media:
    10
    Likes Received:
    49
    Gender:
    Male
    Take the NFL referees this year, give them a intellectual IQ of 30, and mix in there a desire to be the star of the show, and you get Hockey referees... be thankful.. :p
     
Sorcerer's Place is a project run entirely by fans and for fans. Maintaining Sorcerer's Place and a stable environment for all our hosted sites requires a substantial amount of our time and funds on a regular basis, so please consider supporting us to keep the site up & running smoothly. Thank you!

Sorcerers.net is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.