1. SPS Accounts:
    Do you find yourself coming back time after time? Do you appreciate the ongoing hard work to keep this community focused and successful in its mission? Please consider supporting us by upgrading to an SPS Account. Besides the warm and fuzzy feeling that comes from supporting a good cause, you'll also get a significant number of ever-expanding perks and benefits on the site and the forums. Click here to find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You are currently viewing Boards o' Magick as a guest, but you can register an account here. Registration is fast, easy and free. Once registered you will have access to search the forums, create and respond to threads, PM other members, upload screenshots and access many other features unavailable to guests.

BoM cultivates a friendly and welcoming atmosphere. We have been aiming for quality over quantity with our forums from their inception, and believe that this distinction is truly tangible and valued by our members. We'd love to have you join us today!

(If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you've forgotten your username or password, click here.)

Thac0

Discussion in 'Dungeons & Dragons + Other RPGs' started by JohnnyRTFM, Sep 27, 2001.

  1. JohnnyRTFM Gems: 10/31
    Latest gem: Zircon


    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2001
    Messages:
    387
    Likes Received:
    0
    I haven't played pen & paper in ten years or so and cannot remember if this applies or not, but playing through Baldur's Gate II I noticed that "to hit" bonuses are based on strength rather than dexterity. I cannot quite figure out the logic behind that. In my mind, it makes sense that strength determines things like how much weight you can carry, how likely you are to break down doors, etc but "to hit" rolls should be based on a characters agility. Anyone know why this is the case? Anything in the player's manual? Any speculations?
     
  2. Shadowcouncil Gems: 29/31
    Latest gem: Glittering Beljuril


    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2001
    Messages:
    3,319
    Likes Received:
    16
    Gender:
    Male
    I suppose Strength has influence on you Thac0 for your attack is heavier, there is more power in it, so have more change to hit through the armor and do damage. I suppose you also have more control in a weapon when you have higher Strength.

    For Ranged weapons, in 3rd edition, you get a dexterity modifier, and you don't have the Strength modifier. However I can understand your point that Dexterity can say something about how you handle a melee weapon but in 3rd edtition Dex gives no bonusses in melee attack.

    For the rest, Thac0 is also based on the class you play (fighters have lower thac0 then mages and also their Thaco reduces faster when they level up), also Weapon specialization and the weapon you use (magic or not) has influence on the Thaco.
     
  3. Voltric Gems: 19/31
    Latest gem: Aquamarine


    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    1,145
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] Headbanger covered most of the major points. I think part of the reason strength gives 'to hit' bonuses is game balance. If those with high DEX were hitting all the time why play a fighter instead of a thief. I agree some of the argument is that the strength is used to cut through the armor of your enemy. In D&D, unlike of RPGs, you can't hit and do no damage. So consider some of those 'near misses' to be hits that just didn't penatrate the armor. Hence, STR should play some rule in figuring these 'to hit' numbers.

    In 3E they did create the weapon finese feat. This feat lets you use DEX instead of STR to determining to hit numbers with light weapons like the rapier. In addition all missile attack are base on DEX 'to hit' and STR for damage when it applies.

    3E did do a lot of address this issue but it's still far from resolved.
     
  4. kemanmaldea Gems: 12/31
    Latest gem: Moonstone


    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2001
    Messages:
    455
    Likes Received:
    0
    Also I think one of their reasons for using the Str. mod is that if you where stronger you would be able to move the weapon quicker B/c you could move its weight easier.

    I hope that made sence.
     
  5. Shraz Gems: 1/31
    Latest gem: Turquoise


    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2001
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think the point about penetrating armour is a very good one, I have pondered this point for a long time. I think it would be good if particular weopons gained the str/dex bonus to hit according to how they operate. The rapier for example should use dex to hit while the bastard sword would be based on strength. Of course this just serves to make the game more complex which a lot of people don't like.
     
  6. Voltric Gems: 19/31
    Latest gem: Aquamarine


    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    1,145
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] To make the system more realistic, and I'm not saying that's a good thing, DEX should deterime all hits and STR damage. In addition Armor should have both a protection rating and a damage resistance. The first to 'reflect' blows and the second to deterime how much damage 'gets through' to hurt the target. But if we go this far we might as well be playing GURPS instead of D&D. D&D is not realistic for a reason, it's a fantasy RPG.
     
  7. Shadowcouncil Gems: 29/31
    Latest gem: Glittering Beljuril


    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2001
    Messages:
    3,319
    Likes Received:
    16
    Gender:
    Male
    Indeed. Maybe they will fix this in the next edition. Howeverthe damage resistance is not necessary, when you do 1d8 damage you can alraedy do less or more damage at a hit. That is in the roll for damage included.

    [This message has been edited by Headbanger (edited October 09, 2001).]
     
  8. Voltric Gems: 19/31
    Latest gem: Aquamarine


    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    1,145
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] Headbanger, not really. Random damage and damage resistance of armor are two different things. For example if you swing an axe at someone ten times each hit will be a bit different, hence the random damage roll. Now if one target is wear leather armor and one plate mail it is to be asumed that the guy in plate mail will take less damage every time. That is damage resistance. Two different things. Do you follow?
     
  9. Ironbeard Gems: 20/31
    Latest gem: Garnet


    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2001
    Messages:
    1,208
    Likes Received:
    0
    And then of course there is the system in Warhammer where you have a to hit roll (based on comparing weapon skill), a to wound roll(Strength vs toughness), and an armour save (like the D&D saves, but representing the effect of armour, with penalties based on strength of attack) and then, in the case of things like cannon, monsters and other hard-hitting thingies a damage roll (bog-standard infantrymen only do 1 damage per hit - and only take 1 damage as well).
     
  10. Crawl Gems: 23/31
    Latest gem: Black Opal


    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2000
    Messages:
    1,530
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yuck! I much prefer my 2 rolls on most attack actions (if I'm luck) with as little math as possible thank you. It takes enough of my brain power to keep up with the AoO's and initiative;)
     
  11. Azardu Gems: 9/31
    Latest gem: Iol


    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2001
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree, two dice are more than enough. Ack! The pain of highlevel gaming, having all those attacks!
     
  12. Shadowcouncil Gems: 29/31
    Latest gem: Glittering Beljuril


    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2001
    Messages:
    3,319
    Likes Received:
    16
    Gender:
    Male
    I agree Voltric. Noy every rule in the game is totally realistic and you can't expect D&D to make a perfect game. Of course positive cristisi to make the game better is always ok and maybe in a later edition they will make the attack rulez some more advanced, however I think there shouldn't be too much rolling for it stops the whole game for a while. I think that when you play with such rules, Thiefs and mages would have a big problem. But how would you exactly make the rules then?
     
  13. Voltric Gems: 19/31
    Latest gem: Aquamarine


    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    1,145
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] I don't exactly follow you question about Mages and thieves? In short the GURPS basic magic system has lots of issues and I try to avoid it at all cost. The Voodoo version is much better. A huge simplification is spells are learned as skills and advantages (like feats) improve casting ability. The whole system is based on mama points.

    Why would thieves be affected?

    Mind you I mostly play GURPS in a high-tech or Ultra-tech setting. I figure if I want to play a fantasy game I'll play D&D or Earth Dawn.
     
  14. Shadowcouncil Gems: 29/31
    Latest gem: Glittering Beljuril


    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2001
    Messages:
    3,319
    Likes Received:
    16
    Gender:
    Male
    Volctric, the point is:

    1. Plates give better AC then Leather or Robe. That's an advantage of taht armor. With your idea, plates should also reduce the amount of damage when you ar hit. Tjen the difference between plates and leather would be too big. I mean that someone in leather is easier hit and get's less damage reduced when hit. I used Thief's and Mages for they use leather (and mages only robes) as a class that would become even more fragile then fighters.

    But can you make it all some more detailed by making an additional rule that would reduce damage, dependent on the armor you use?
     
  15. Voltric Gems: 19/31
    Latest gem: Aquamarine


    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    1,145
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] That is the exact situation. DR is totally dependent on the type of armor you are wearing. For example leather might have a DR of 5 and Plate mail a DR of 12. This means you would ignore the first 5 points of damage in leather and the first 12 in plate. The GURPS system is far more complex than that of D&D. In addition armor give passive defense. The glancing blow factor. The PD and DR of armor are independent of each other. Character also have active defenses like dodge, blocks and parrys. As I said it much more complex. Go check out the http://www.sjgames.com/gurps/ website if you want more info.
     
  16. Shadowcouncil Gems: 29/31
    Latest gem: Glittering Beljuril


    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2001
    Messages:
    3,319
    Likes Received:
    16
    Gender:
    Male
    Thanks, I will take a look, however I think the system inD&D isn't bad :)
     
  17. Voltric Gems: 19/31
    Latest gem: Aquamarine


    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    1,145
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] Headbanger, mind you I love D&D. I thought 2E was great and 3E is even better. But D&D only works for one genure - fantasy. If you want to play a game in another setting - Cyberpunk, Modern, Supers, Horror, Robotech or Space - you can't really use the D&D system it's to specific. Again this is not a bad thing, only that I play some other style games as well.
     
  18. Shadowcouncil Gems: 29/31
    Latest gem: Glittering Beljuril


    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2001
    Messages:
    3,319
    Likes Received:
    16
    Gender:
    Male
    I understand that... and you are right... but for these genres are indeed other games that have systems specialized on that genre... Shadowrun, Vampire.. etc.
     
Sorcerer's Place is a project run entirely by fans and for fans. Maintaining Sorcerer's Place and a stable environment for all our hosted sites requires a substantial amount of our time and funds on a regular basis, so please consider supporting us to keep the site up & running smoothly. Thank you!

Sorcerers.net is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.