1. SPS Accounts:
    Do you find yourself coming back time after time? Do you appreciate the ongoing hard work to keep this community focused and successful in its mission? Please consider supporting us by upgrading to an SPS Account. Besides the warm and fuzzy feeling that comes from supporting a good cause, you'll also get a significant number of ever-expanding perks and benefits on the site and the forums. Click here to find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You are currently viewing Boards o' Magick as a guest, but you can register an account here. Registration is fast, easy and free. Once registered you will have access to search the forums, create and respond to threads, PM other members, upload screenshots and access many other features unavailable to guests.

BoM cultivates a friendly and welcoming atmosphere. We have been aiming for quality over quantity with our forums from their inception, and believe that this distinction is truly tangible and valued by our members. We'd love to have you join us today!

(If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you've forgotten your username or password, click here.)

United Nations to Abolish Traditional Chinese in 2008

Discussion in 'Alley of Dangerous Angles' started by shadow lurker, Jun 13, 2007.

  1. shadow lurker Gems: 17/31
    Latest gem: Star Diopside


    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    987
    Likes Received:
    0
  2. Morgoroth

    Morgoroth Just because I happen to have tentacles, it doesn'

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    2,392
    Likes Received:
    45
    Languages evolve and change, simplified chinese seems to be the direction so I see little point in this petition. UN has in the end very little influence in the matter, it will be the chinese speaking countries that affect it and the biggest and most significant of them seems to have made up its mind so it pretty much seems that resistance is futile. :borg:

    [ June 13, 2007, 14:09: Message edited by: Morgoroth ]
     
  3. The Shaman Gems: 28/31
    Latest gem: Star Sapphire


    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    54
    China is more than a little able to decide what to do with its language - or what happens at the UN. Which, by and large, seems more predisposed to preserve old languages (look at the UNESCO program) than to ban them Quite frankly, if such a measure passes it will be because Beijing is behind it and wants to give it some "international gloss."

    It may sound strange, but the only reason the UN would have anything to do with it is if China thinks that abolishing the traditional alphabet on its own would lead to counteractions, especially by Taiwan. AFAIK in Beijing they are always thinking of keeping Taiwan close - and eventually getting it back.

    Still, I'll give it a look, just in case.

    Edit: okay, so this is against using traditional Chinese in UN documents. Hmm, except that the UN will cut down the number of translators, how exactly would this impact the fate of traditional Chinese?

    [ June 14, 2007, 08:57: Message edited by: The Shaman ]
     
  4. teekc Gems: 23/31
    Latest gem: Black Opal


    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2002
    Messages:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    0
    i understand evolution, i study biology after all, but simplified chinese is not a result of evolution. It is people actively changing the language of chinese, i.e. it is not natural.

    The chinese characters we are using now comes from, around, 221 bc. Over the course of this 3000 years a lot of characters changed due to the natural result of evolution, some characters no longer useful, some characters no longer have current meaning, some characters are created because new stuff are created. Simplified characters comes around in 1956; The simplification covers replacing a few different characters with same pronunciation with a single character, replacing a more complicated character with just a part of that character, etc. Therefore simplified characters cannot justified stuff written before 1956.

    A lot of chinese are afraid of simplified characters replace traditional characters. Like i said, traditional characters comes around in 221 BC, when the first emperor of china unified the whole country. Before him, there were a least 6 states in china and each using their own "chinese characters". Then the cruel first emperor came, force everyone to use the same characters, killing those opposed and burning books along the way. A large of chinese heritage were lost at that time. Simplified chinese are just repeating history itself. Even earlier than that, when archaeologists dug out artifacts from ~1700 BC, they found that chinese characters were lesser, using a characters to express different meanings. Chinese characters became as time goes on. Comparing trad. chinese with 1700 BC chinese, one can see how a character representing different meanings evolve into different characters.

    Any person who learn chinese can easily identify sim. and trad. chinese characters. So there is no need to have different persons doing the same job. Financial consideration, or even convenience, is not even a problem here.

    UN is suppose to represent the whole world. Using only sim. characters effectively silence some parts of the world, this isn't very healthy.

    [ June 14, 2007, 12:16: Message edited by: teekc ]
     
  5. Montresor

    Montresor Mostly Harmless Staff Member ★ SPS Account Holder

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    3,103
    Media:
    127
    Likes Received:
    183
    Gender:
    Male
    [​IMG] There is a political side to this as well. Simplified Chinese is used in the People's Republic of China (invented by the PRC in order to promote literacy), while Chinese outside the PRC (especially Taiwan) use Traditional Chinese.

    To Beijing, this is undoubtedly a way of haressing Taipei.

    Wikipedia: Simplified Chinese

    Wikipedia: Traditional Chinese
     
  6. The Shaman Gems: 28/31
    Latest gem: Star Sapphire


    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    54
    So apparently Beijing has a better lobby at the UN than Taipei does. Interesting, but hardly surprising - at least unless Taiwan really cries wolf and starts pulling strings with Japan and the US.
     
Sorcerer's Place is a project run entirely by fans and for fans. Maintaining Sorcerer's Place and a stable environment for all our hosted sites requires a substantial amount of our time and funds on a regular basis, so please consider supporting us to keep the site up & running smoothly. Thank you!

Sorcerers.net is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.