1. SPS Accounts:
    Do you find yourself coming back time after time? Do you appreciate the ongoing hard work to keep this community focused and successful in its mission? Please consider supporting us by upgrading to an SPS Account. Besides the warm and fuzzy feeling that comes from supporting a good cause, you'll also get a significant number of ever-expanding perks and benefits on the site and the forums. Click here to find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You are currently viewing Boards o' Magick as a guest, but you can register an account here. Registration is fast, easy and free. Once registered you will have access to search the forums, create and respond to threads, PM other members, upload screenshots and access many other features unavailable to guests.

BoM cultivates a friendly and welcoming atmosphere. We have been aiming for quality over quantity with our forums from their inception, and believe that this distinction is truly tangible and valued by our members. We'd love to have you join us today!

(If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you've forgotten your username or password, click here.)

What makes a species?

Discussion in 'Whatnots' started by Christopher_Lee, Feb 21, 2002.

  1. Christopher_Lee Gems: 10/31
    Latest gem: Zircon


    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2002
    Messages:
    371
    Likes Received:
    0
  2. Viking Gems: 19/31
    Latest gem: Aquamarine


    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2001
    Messages:
    1,102
    Likes Received:
    1
    Do you mean the definition of the word or people's interpretation of it?

    If you're looking for a definition, why not try a dictionary or just search on the web. Darwin probably defined it although I've got bugger all idea what he said on that point.

    If you're looking for a more interesting discussion regarding interpretation, then why not post the definition and we could debate it's merits?

    Edit:

    Species
    the largest natural population of organisms that can interbreed to produce fertile offspring. Members of one species are reproductively isolated from members of all other species (i.e., they cannot mate with them to produce fertile offspring).

    From: Classification of living things - by Dennis O'Neil, Ph.D.

    I couldn't find it defined by Darwin, but I didn't look very hard.

    [This message has been edited by Viking (edited February 21, 2002).]
     
  3. Xenecor Gems: 10/31
    Latest gem: Zircon


    Joined:
    May 16, 2001
    Messages:
    361
    Likes Received:
    0
    Here is a list of several scientists' interpretations of the term "species" (albeit brief) including Charles Darwin and Carl Linnaeus (developer of taxonomic identification).

    A separate search of individual concepts will prove to be more conclusive, but I think that this will help in deciding whom you feel is more accurate.
    http://www.icr.org/pubs/imp/imp-211.htm

    [This message has been edited by Xenecor (edited February 21, 2002).]
     
  4. the god Gems: 13/31
    Latest gem: Ziose


    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Messages:
    578
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] fantastic, good to know we've finally got this issue resolved after those comments by the squirrel and mule lovers. :love:
     
  5. Slith

    Slith Look at me! I have Blue Hands! Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    502
    Likes Received:
    6
    :love: I :love: love :love: squirrels!
     
  6. the god Gems: 13/31
    Latest gem: Ziose


    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Messages:
    578
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] slith- you've just gone up sharply in my in my estimations, thanks to your ingenious use of smilies. :heh:
     
  7. DragonRider SkyWard Gems: 16/31
    Latest gem: Shandon


    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2001
    Messages:
    830
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm not sure about spices being just one animal. We're animals. I think that some day that were going to start interbreading with other spices to surive. Eather that or we're going to bread a new spices that goes all wrong and eats us all.
     
  8. Christopher_Lee Gems: 10/31
    Latest gem: Zircon


    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2002
    Messages:
    371
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's right dragonrider. Now take your medication and go to sleep there's a good lunatic.
     
  9. Xenecor Gems: 10/31
    Latest gem: Zircon


    Joined:
    May 16, 2001
    Messages:
    361
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dragonrider, you have it ALL wrong. You see, it is us who eat the spices. Not the other way around.

    Seriously though, in taxonomic identification... Animals are in the kindgom Animalia.... the largest portion of the identification system.
    Kingdom
    Phylum
    Class
    Order
    Family
    Genus
    Species

    Ergo, it is impossible for animals to be a single species.
     
  10. GuarMar487 Gems: 3/31
    Latest gem: Lynx Eye


    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2002
    Messages:
    53
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] ahhh that brings back so many mmemories of 7th grade biology, DAMN my cigarette smokin teach, DAMN HER!
     
  11. the god Gems: 13/31
    Latest gem: Ziose


    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Messages:
    578
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] whittaker's 5-kingdom classification has been obsolete for a few years now, Xenecor.

    developed in 1977 (though only recently accepted) the 3-domain system developed by woese (based on variation between small subunit ribosomal RNA sequences) is now accepted by all evolutionary biologists (:p the only scientists that matter!) :square:
     
  12. Xenecor Gems: 10/31
    Latest gem: Zircon


    Joined:
    May 16, 2001
    Messages:
    361
    Likes Received:
    0
    *sigh* Even by the most obsolete of systems.. it is impossible to say animals are species.. Anyway, that's not really the point so it doesn't matter.
     
  13. the god Gems: 13/31
    Latest gem: Ziose


    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Messages:
    578
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] you asked for it... there are SIX different species concepts:
    1)morphological
    2)evolutionary
    3)isolation/recognition
    4)cohesion
    5)phylogenetic
    6)biological

    without going into too much detail... 1 is what non-scientists would believe distinguishes seperate species (differences in appearance), however 1 doesn't take into account sexual and developmental polymorphisms (latter- think e.g. tadpoles/frogs).

    2 is monophyletic descent, for which there is obviously already a name for, and so can also be thrown out of the window.

    3 can only be applied to sexual, biparental organisms and so is also not valid.

    4=6 rewritten.

    5 is quite interesting, arguing that the definition should be based upon the products of evolution rather than the processes that led to those products.

    therefore 5 and 6 are the most likely. however, 6 -the biological species concept (reproductive isolation, discussed extensively in a previous post and above) is favoured because you are able to say what a species is at a (relatively) single point in time. :square:
     
  14. Vukodlak Gems: 22/31
    Latest gem: Sphene


    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    1,443
    Likes Received:
    6
    That was a really detailed and comprehensive reply. What are the three domains of classification by the way?

    Thank god
     
  15. the god Gems: 13/31
    Latest gem: Ziose


    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Messages:
    578
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] Bacteria (Eubacteria), Archaea (Archaebacteria) and Eukarya (eukaryotes). the old terms (brackets) are the ones used at the beginning (1977) of the 'woesian revolution'.
     
Sorcerer's Place is a project run entirely by fans and for fans. Maintaining Sorcerer's Place and a stable environment for all our hosted sites requires a substantial amount of our time and funds on a regular basis, so please consider supporting us to keep the site up & running smoothly. Thank you!

Sorcerers.net is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.