1. SPS Accounts:
    Do you find yourself coming back time after time? Do you appreciate the ongoing hard work to keep this community focused and successful in its mission? Please consider supporting us by upgrading to an SPS Account. Besides the warm and fuzzy feeling that comes from supporting a good cause, you'll also get a significant number of ever-expanding perks and benefits on the site and the forums. Click here to find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You are currently viewing Boards o' Magick as a guest, but you can register an account here. Registration is fast, easy and free. Once registered you will have access to search the forums, create and respond to threads, PM other members, upload screenshots and access many other features unavailable to guests.

BoM cultivates a friendly and welcoming atmosphere. We have been aiming for quality over quantity with our forums from their inception, and believe that this distinction is truly tangible and valued by our members. We'd love to have you join us today!

(If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you've forgotten your username or password, click here.)

Why Did They Reduce NPCs in BG2?

Discussion in 'BG2: Shadows of Amn (Classic)' started by kasio, May 8, 2001.

  1. kasio Gems: 7/31
    Latest gem: Tchazar


    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2001
    Messages:
    212
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why Did They Reduced NPC in BG2?
    16 is too few i think. And most of them are useless withou magic modificators...
    Where is Coran and Alora with dex over 18?
     
  2. Ragusa

    Ragusa Eternal Halfling Paladin Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2000
    Messages:
    10,140
    Media:
    63
    Likes Received:
    250
    Gender:
    Male
    Actually it seems as if the makers wanted to put in more depth into the single NPCs to achieve nmore party interaction - so I guess there wasn´t that much time (and programmers) available to include more NPCs.

    Some pure thiefs (good ones) or more fighters to choose of would have been nice.
     
  3. kasio Gems: 7/31
    Latest gem: Tchazar


    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2001
    Messages:
    212
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] More NPCs, free global movement.
    Seems that only BG2 advantage over BG1 is that max number of arrows is stack now is 40 instead of 20...
    BG2 takes 200-300 gaming hours. How long was predecessor?

    [This message has been edited by kasio (edited May 08, 2001).]
     
  4. IronEagle Gems: 13/31
    Latest gem: Ziose


    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2000
    Messages:
    582
    Likes Received:
    0
    Again, noone could give you a proper time frame, because some of us can go through the game in less than than 35 game days, which im not sure but i think thats like 3-5 hours? If you know exactly what your doing. And some of us take the actual "approx game time" of about 50 hours, so it just depends where your level of play is.
     
  5. kasio Gems: 7/31
    Latest gem: Tchazar


    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2001
    Messages:
    212
    Likes Received:
    0
    bwah.
    Just compare BG1 hours to BG2 200-300 hours.
    Longer? Shorter? 2 times longer? 2 times shorter? I dont ask you exact hours ofcourse.
     
  6. Slappy Gems: 19/31
    Latest gem: Aquamarine


    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2001
    Messages:
    1,138
    Likes Received:
    0
    Kasio, if your feeling down about BG2 v BG1 take a look at this post:
    http://www.sorcerers.net/ubb/Forum2/HTML/001760.html

    I was feeling a bit miffed although I still really like BG2 I felt they had gone in the wrong direction. However there are some positives about BG2 too, read the post.
     
  7. kasio Gems: 7/31
    Latest gem: Tchazar


    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2001
    Messages:
    212
    Likes Received:
    0
    Now thats where I agree with you!!!
    Slap: "BG1 always felt like you were exploring a huge area of land and the city itself felt massive. In BG2 everything feels like a small computer game in comparison."
    And this is all because of freely explorable world map.
    Slap:"Improvements for BG2: better graphics, bigger game, new monsters, more spells."
    Well even if BG2 is bigger (more mosters more rooms) it is still more linear. And nobody would dare to object that.

    And these new classes: Monk & Kensai. I agree they are interesting to play. But they damage in-game feeling as well as metal sewers, red pianos and similar stuff.
    Yea this is all fiction, fantasy and all that, BUT IF a bare handed MONK punches fire breathing DRAGON this is not a fantasy this is DELIRIUM (of a diseased cow, i assume)!
    Until this game all classes was more or less Tolkien/European Medieval oriented. Now hells knows where from comes our dear guests from Asia - Monk & Kensai. What will be next? Indians archers and Eskimo pulka rider warriors?!?!?!?!?!
    Damn I am mad on this!!!
     
  8. Parvini Gems: 10/31
    Latest gem: Zircon


    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2001
    Messages:
    364
    Likes Received:
    0
    Of course BG2 is a brilliant game.... if you think that it is linear wait until you play "Return to Krondor". At least there is a multitude of options in which direction to take your party and who you can take in your party. Krondor was such a waste, imagine playing BG2 in the Return to Krondor format with a fully explorable world map. That is surely the ultimate RPG
     
Sorcerer's Place is a project run entirely by fans and for fans. Maintaining Sorcerer's Place and a stable environment for all our hosted sites requires a substantial amount of our time and funds on a regular basis, so please consider supporting us to keep the site up & running smoothly. Thank you!

Sorcerers.net is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.