1. SPS Accounts:
    Do you find yourself coming back time after time? Do you appreciate the ongoing hard work to keep this community focused and successful in its mission? Please consider supporting us by upgrading to an SPS Account. Besides the warm and fuzzy feeling that comes from supporting a good cause, you'll also get a significant number of ever-expanding perks and benefits on the site and the forums. Click here to find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You are currently viewing Boards o' Magick as a guest, but you can register an account here. Registration is fast, easy and free. Once registered you will have access to search the forums, create and respond to threads, PM other members, upload screenshots and access many other features unavailable to guests.

BoM cultivates a friendly and welcoming atmosphere. We have been aiming for quality over quantity with our forums from their inception, and believe that this distinction is truly tangible and valued by our members. We'd love to have you join us today!

(If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you've forgotten your username or password, click here.)

Why read fantasy?

Discussion in 'Booktalk' started by Oaz, Nov 10, 2005.

  1. Oaz Gems: 29/31
    Latest gem: Glittering Beljuril


    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2001
    Messages:
    3,140
    Likes Received:
    0
    No surprise that most of the books discussed here are fantasy.

    What I would like to know is why you read fantasy instead of, say, science fiction, realistic fiction, Shakespeare, biography, etc., etc. Is it because fantasy has a certain aesthetic or escapist appeal, or does it resonante with you on a deeper level?
     
  2. Goli Ironhead Gems: 16/31
    Latest gem: Shandon


    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2004
    Messages:
    859
    Likes Received:
    1
    Well, i do read a lot of fantasy. But who says it's the only thing i read? :D
    I also read Sci-Fi, trillers, realistic fiction and anything that looks intresting. Althought i still read mostly fantasy. I don't know exactly why, i just like it.
     
  3. Aikanaro Gems: 31/31
    Latest gem: Rogue Stone


    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2001
    Messages:
    5,521
    Likes Received:
    20
    Not many fantasy books appeal to me anymore - the ones that I elevate to greatness are the ones with a certain atmosphere to them that put you in a mood. I'm especially after fantasy books with a feeling of 'magicalness'.
    Some are just extremely well written also, such as Hobb's books.

    And I do read science fiction, and have started delving into magical realism.
     
  4. Carcaroth

    Carcaroth I call on the priests, saints and dancin' girls ★ SPS Account Holder

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,655
    Likes Received:
    5
    Not entirely sure why I prefer Fantasy to Sci-fi. I think there tends to be more available on the market, particularly in the thicker volume category. My preference is generally for books which pay attention to world and character creation, rather than just reciting a story. For me, this is what creates the mood atmosphere which Aik refers to. As I've probably found this more with larger books it might part-way explain my preference. I'm not a big fan of the Hack & Slash/Dungeons and Treasure books (Terry Brooks Shannara series, Salvatores Drizzt, Weis and Hickman etc)

    I do read Sci-fi thoug, and also some Crime fiction, Historical fiction, and Comedy fiction (currently on Tom Sharpe's collection).
     
  5. Meatdog Gems: 15/31
    Latest gem: Waterstar


    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    788
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think it is because fantasy books tend to have this epic feeling to them, which I mostly found lacking in other types of literature. Yes, it clearly is the epic feel, as the only sci-fi I enjoyed had that same feel. It doesn't necessarily need to be fantasy for me, but most other genres tend to not have the epicness that attracts me in fantasy.
     
  6. AMaster Gems: 26/31
    Latest gem: Diamond


    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2000
    Messages:
    2,495
    Media:
    1
    Likes Received:
    50
    I don't read fantasy instead of other genres; I read it in addition to other genres.

    I read more fantasy and SF than anything else, granted, but they're hardly the only things I read; autobiographies, biographies, historical texts (Victor Hansen never fails to entertain), technothrillers, mystery, noir...

    Lots of stuff :p
     
  7. Harbourboy

    Harbourboy Take thy form from off my door! Veteran Pillars of Eternity SP Immortalizer (for helping immortalize Sorcerer's Place in the game!)

    Joined:
    May 29, 2003
    Messages:
    13,354
    Likes Received:
    99
    Probably because I start reading one book in a fantasy series so I end up reading the rest of the series (unless its rubbish). I like the feeling that I get a bit of 'payoff' from the time invested in learning about a certain group of characters in one book because I can apply that learning to the subsequent books.
     
  8. Enagonios Gems: 31/31
    Latest gem: Rogue Stone


    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2001
    Messages:
    6,089
    Likes Received:
    5
    Ditto, except substitute "Sci-fi" with mystery and "trillers" with thrillers ;) Also "Althought" with although while you're at it :p

    Ditto as well, although I sometimes find the "epic feel" in historical fiction as well.
     
  9. Newfie Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    427
    Likes Received:
    0
    Fantasy is pure escapism -- a world that exists by a different set of rules. Where all problems can be erased with a simple twist of a sword or a blast of a fireball. There is little, simple or no political intrigue. Where all women are beautiful and men are courageous and strong. Villains are easily determined and monsters are hideous and dangerous. Fantasy worlds are strongly defined; there are no blurry lines or greyness. Everything is very simple. You are evil or good, rich or poor, brave or cowardly.

    Fantasy that does not appeal to me is the story that does not create a large gap between reality and the fantasy world. Why create a fantasy world? Just make it historical fiction. I want that chasm between this world's mould and the code of another. And the more intricate the details, the better.

    Sci-fi does not appeal to me. Science and space are still a link to our world. That's taboo for me, the fantasy lover.

    I still enjoy the great detective story by Michael Connelly, Val McDermid, Denis Lehane or Ed McBain. But I find myself enjoying them less and less as I get older as the truths revealed in them often painfully coincide with our world's penchant for evil.

    Fantasy is becoming my only genre; a place to escape and watch the triumph of good over evil and that wonderful tale woven to get there.

    Just my two cents.
     
  10. Enagonios Gems: 31/31
    Latest gem: Rogue Stone


    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2001
    Messages:
    6,089
    Likes Received:
    5
    While that's true for many fantasy books newfie, some excellent exceptions that come to mind are asoiaf by martin and the farseer by hobb which are loaded with political intrigue and "gray areas".
     
  11. Newfie Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    427
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am familiar with those authors, Enagonios and it is precisely the reasons I listed above that I don't enjoy their work.

    I would be naive to think that there would not be some authors who would try to narrow the gap between our world and someone like Tolkien's. But give me Tolkien's or Howard's any day over Hobb's or Gemmel's. Hobb's novels could be written as historical fiction with only a few changes. If I want deep political intrigue or human interest, I'll just turn on the news.

    I should have said my view of fantasy existed as such. I am aware that many readers on this board enjoy Hobb and Martin. To each their own.

    [ November 14, 2005, 18:01: Message edited by: Newfie ]
     
  12. Meatdog Gems: 15/31
    Latest gem: Waterstar


    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    788
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes, except that it are just those few differences that make it interesting. And I personally don't find Hobb's world to be low-magic, and as such your argument about the gap being too small is unsustained.

    I however can understand your dislike for Martin's work, eventhough I don't share it. You probably dislike the fact that everybody has reasons for doing what they do, so there are no true heroes or vilains.

    The gap between fantasy and reality, the thing that allows the escapism, is not the black/white instead of gray that you are looking for, although it is in most fantasy a major element. I am however convinced you can find it in other literature too. What defines fantasy for me (although I know this is in no way an official definition) is the mystery. You are probably going to argue that in historical fiction that mystery is also present, but it's not the same, since if it's really historical fiction and not fantasy, you know it is only superstition of the characters.

    Now, a question for everybody: magic in a modern (current time, not future), is this considered fantasy or not? Sci-fi it is definitely not.
     
  13. kuemper Gems: 31/31
    Latest gem: Rogue Stone


    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2005
    Messages:
    8,926
    Likes Received:
    8
    I keep my books in 2 categories: non-fiction and fiction. I read fiction. Yes, a lot of it could happen IRL, but does it realy matter? The point for me reading is to have enjoyment with my imagination.
     
  14. Newfie Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    427
    Likes Received:
    0
    Meatdog, I don't like Hobb's writing personally. I find her writing low magic compared to the fantasy I prefer. Whether other' s do not, that is their perogative. Court intrigue and political manoeuvering just doesn't do it for me. Very easily adapted to a French Revolution or Roman type setting,

    Whether the gap is small or not, I find her writing meticulous to the point of mediocrity. I like my fantasy swinging; swords cutting, bodies crashing and spells flashing. I like heroic fantasy; Sword and Sorcery if you will. Hobb has her good points; she is descriptive but her plot does not move fast enough to hold my sustained interest.

    I like a decent story, well developed characters but most of all, I like vivid description and atmosphere in a fantasy setting. Gory battle scenes with fantastic settings and imagery is what floats my boat.

    [ November 14, 2005, 18:04: Message edited by: Newfie ]
     
  15. Chandos the Red

    Chandos the Red This Wheel's on Fire

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2003
    Messages:
    8,252
    Media:
    82
    Likes Received:
    238
    Gender:
    Male
    Tolkien's world was, in certain ways, a narrow gap between the real world and the literary tradition in which he had spent his life working. Ever notice how much like the typical middle class people, Bilbo or Frodo are like in both character and habit? More directly, how much like Edwardian Englishmen are these characters representative?

    Furthermore, Tolkien's work is not "only" escapism. During his lifetime he knew more about the English language than anyone else. His work was steeped in an Anglo-Saxon literary tradition that went back to the roots of _Beowulf_, a subject on which he wrote with distinguished academic authority. Out of Anglo-Saxon and Norse mythology, which was mostly lost on the mainstream public, Tolkien crafted, in large part, the shape of the fantasy genre that is so very popular today. Of course there were a few others who were attmepting the same, but Tolkien was the one who succeeded.
     
  16. Newfie Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    427
    Likes Received:
    0
    I know, Chandos. Also the comparisons of the World War and the time when LOTR was written. Of how Sauron was Hitler and the fighting Uruk-hai and the ravanging Nazi troops.

    But isn't that like any fantasy novel? Comparisons of real life and the fantasy world? Robert E Howard' s Conan was supposed to be representative of the personality he wish he had, as he suffered in a relationship with a domineering mother in a small town. Hence the almighty Conan, who buckles to no one and spends his time globetrotting and most of his female roles resulted in squealing, helpless "wenches".

    I try not to look to deep into a novel and just take it for what it is. Even Tolkien said to take LOTR for what it was; a work of fantasy fiction and not a social commentary on the events of the day. I absorb what's there and try to take as entertainment and enjoyment out of it as I can.
     
  17. Alavin

    Alavin If I wanted your view, I'd read your entrails Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    Messages:
    930
    Likes Received:
    0
    I read a lot of fantasy stuff, but I prefer low-magic, preferably set in the real world. That's why I read a lot of Stephen King. I like David Gemmell's stuff too, since his novels tend to be set in a parallel history setting, if that makes any sense at all.

    I'm no fan of Tolkein. I don't like his writing style, and the content has become very cliché. And just because he invented that cliché doesn't stop it being dull.
     
  18. Chandos the Red

    Chandos the Red This Wheel's on Fire

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2003
    Messages:
    8,252
    Media:
    82
    Likes Received:
    238
    Gender:
    Male
    Absolutely, I only wanted to point out that there is also a serious side to Tolkien's work, one which is often overlooked, even by academics. That serious side also reflects the notion that the fantasy genre has both a literary and a historical tradition steeped in the Middle Ages. In my opinion, Tolkien, as a writer, is every bit as important as any other serious author of the 20th century, including Hemingway, Steinbeck, etc.
     
  19. Newfie Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    427
    Likes Received:
    0
    The fantasy genre has been a part of our literary history for a long time and should be given it's just due. Homer's Iliad and Odyssey are two major works of fantasy as are all the legends of the Norse, Roman and Greek gods. The "Classic Fantasy" set in the middle ages with knights, dragons, elves, trolls, and goblins are all descended from those ancient myths.

    Tolkien should indeed be recognized for his works. How many kids today can say they know the characters in "The Grapes of Wrath" or "The Old Man and the Sea" as compared to LOTR? How many kids tried to pick up and read the Hobbit or LOTR after watching the series? Hey, if it gets kids interested in reading today it is having a more profound effect than Hemingway or Steinback will. A movie of "The Pearl" or "For Whom the Bell Tolls" would not fare so well. With Lewis's Narnia Tales arriving in theaters soon, the sales of comicbook hero movies and the success of Harry Potter, fantasy may be the defining genre of the decade.

    [ November 15, 2005, 12:37: Message edited by: Newfie ]
     
  20. Chandos the Red

    Chandos the Red This Wheel's on Fire

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2003
    Messages:
    8,252
    Media:
    82
    Likes Received:
    238
    Gender:
    Male
    While a student at the University of Houston, I spent my third year in the creative writing program. At the time the program was ranked #2 in the nation, (I guess by those who keep track of such things). My point is that it was a high-powered program, and with some great instructors. But we could not even submit anything that was fantasy adventure in the program. The instructors even refused to read anything that was fantasy. It was not considered to be "serious fiction."

    Anyway I left the program in my senior year to study literature, mostly Medieval and Renaissance texts. I did take one class which was entirely devoted to adolescent literature which was also a master's level course. Tolkien was even excluded from that class, because he was considered "fantasy." I then inquired about C.S. Lewis, since my feeling was that _The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe_ would be almost a perfect fit for such a class. Again I was met with the same response: "well it's really fantasy, so..." Really, we were doing stuff like _The Secret Garden_, but Tolkien and Lewis were not allowed because of the "fantasy stigma." At some colleges - certainly not all - there is a real reluctance to even consider Tolkien and LotR in a serious manner.
     
Sorcerer's Place is a project run entirely by fans and for fans. Maintaining Sorcerer's Place and a stable environment for all our hosted sites requires a substantial amount of our time and funds on a regular basis, so please consider supporting us to keep the site up & running smoothly. Thank you!

Sorcerers.net is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.