Your favorite classes

Remove all ads!

Post your favorite posts like his:
I: Fighters.
II: kensai/thief(with any dual or even normal)
III: Pallies.
IV: sorcerors.
V: thiefs
VI: clerics
VII: mages
VIII: monks
VIIII: barabarians
X:Inquisitor and druids.

Will you send it to me like I have done or (1) or (a)!!!

Thanks in advance.

Paddy!!!

[This message has been edited by Padine the Paladin (edited June 05, 2002).]

 

When I saw this thread, I said to myself, "Self, this is gonna be moved by a mod." But who knows.

1) Fighters Monks and Paladines
2) Cleric
3) Thief
4) Mage or Sorcerer
5) Barbarian
6) Druid

 

1) Sorcerer

 

Nitpick: There is no VIIII, it's IX. Use regular numbers if you find them easier.

 

OK, let's first off exclude kensai and inquisitor, since those are 2E BG2 kits and not 3E classes.

Here's my order. And Blackmane was right, it's IX.

I: Bards (an option oddly absent on your list)
II: Fighters
III: Thieves
IV: Clerics
V: Mages
VI: Monks
VII: Rangers (another missing option)
VIII: Sorcerers
IX: Druids
X: Paladins
XI: Barbarians

 

So why do you want it list like an outline? Here is my order for 3E classes.

I: Clerics
II: Druids
III: Rangers
IV: Paladins
V: Bards
VI: Barbarians
VII: Fighters
VIII: Rogues
IX: Mages
X: Sorcerers
XI: Monks

Of course with Prestige classes you can have fun with character of any class.

[This message has been edited by Voltric (edited June 06, 2002).]

 

Well let me add in my almighty opinion

1. Wizards
2. Rogues
3. Rangers
4. Bards
5. Druids

The rest, I don't care for much, but every class can be a lot of fun.

 

No one likes Psionics?

I)Psion
II)Psychic Warrior
III)Sorcerer
IV)Ranger
V)Cleric

 

Maybe it's because this topic is AD&D, not D&D, and it seems greatly BG-influenced.

Anyway, psionics are neat, although nearly everyone seems to have a problem with the rules, or think that they don't fit a fantasy game. Just check the WotC boards and count all the psionic-bashing topics. If you can find them amongst all the 'i r kill tarrasque' and '<insert class name> sux0rz/rox0rz' topics, that is.

(Ok, so the WotC boards aren't that bad. But with that many eggs in a basket, some are bound to be rotten.)

 

where does it say it's ad&d?

Wizards & Sorcerer
Cleric & Fighter

dunno what comes next

 

1. Paladin

2. Rogue

3. Sorcerer

4. Ranger

5. Cleric

6. Bard

7. Barbarian

8. Wizard

9. Druid

10. Monk

11. Fighter

 

I. Wizards (of any kind, preferably not specialists)
II.Sorcerers
III.Rangers
IV.Clerics

Most hated class:
Pallies

 

Well, last time I read the rulebooks there weren't any kits or dualclasses in the game. (There are in the first post of the topic.) But if you in your infinite wisdom know WotC has added official kits and dualclasses back in, then I suppose it isn't AD&D.

 

Give or take:

I: Bards
II: Fighters(in 3E, any other then knock this down a few pegs)
III: Rogues
IV: Paladins
V: Clerics
VI: Mages
VII: Sorcerers
VIII: Barbarians
IX: Rangers
X: Monks
XI: Druids


Cullain

 

1) Fighter
2) Monk
3) Rogue
4) Barbarian
5) Ranger
6) Druid
7) Cleric
8) Wizard
9) Sorcerer
10)Bard
11)Paladin.

My preference goes like this: I would always choose a fighting type character above a spellcaster. I have a weakness for the rogue class, though. I'll go for divine spells over arcane, and the cooler, more meticulous wizard over the sorcerer. I can't envision myself as a bard, hence the low ranking. In BG, the class was underpowered anyway.



[This message has been edited by Shura (edited June 14, 2002).]

 

What about prestige classes?

I) Shadowdancer
II) Shadow Adept
III) Rogue
IV) Bard
V) Wizard
VI) Druid

 

Well, we just got "Tome and Blood" at our house and so:

I. Wizard
II. Sorceror

The Blood Magus! How unbelievably cool -- I would limit it to females, though.

 

Why would you limit it to only females?
Anyways, give or take:

I. Ranger
II. Sorcerer
III. Barbarian
IV. Psychic Warrior
V. Druids
VI. Rogue
VII. Mages
VIII. Bards
IX. Monks
X. Psion
XI. Paladin
XII. Fighter
XIII. Cleric

 

Well... because, for human females, seeing one's own blood is not necessarily a sign of injury, but sometimes quite the reverse: a sign of youth and health. Right?

 

I guess...