1. SPS Accounts:
    Do you find yourself coming back time after time? Do you appreciate the ongoing hard work to keep this community focused and successful in its mission? Please consider supporting us by upgrading to an SPS Account. Besides the warm and fuzzy feeling that comes from supporting a good cause, you'll also get a significant number of ever-expanding perks and benefits on the site and the forums. Click here to find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You are currently viewing Boards o' Magick as a guest, but you can register an account here. Registration is fast, easy and free. Once registered you will have access to search the forums, create and respond to threads, PM other members, upload screenshots and access many other features unavailable to guests.

BoM cultivates a friendly and welcoming atmosphere. We have been aiming for quality over quantity with our forums from their inception, and believe that this distinction is truly tangible and valued by our members. We'd love to have you join us today!

(If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you've forgotten your username or password, click here.)

Amazon won't censor

Discussion in 'Alley of Dangerous Angles' started by Silvery, Nov 11, 2010.

  1. LKD Gems: 31/31
    Latest gem: Rogue Stone


    Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2002
    Messages:
    6,284
    Likes Received:
    271
    Gender:
    Male
    I want to underscore my previous point by referencing this article about a pervert who got pardoned (because of a lame ass liberal law, mind you, not because he was exonerated in any way) and what one of his high profile victims had to say.

    I'm no expert in the field, and perhaps Kennedy doesn't have a degree in child psychotherapy, but his firsthand experience and subsequent experiences with other child victims means that his words carry a hell of a lot of weight with me.
     
  2. LKD Gems: 31/31
    Latest gem: Rogue Stone


    Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2002
    Messages:
    6,284
    Likes Received:
    271
    Gender:
    Male
    When I first saw this article, I said "WTF?" but after reading it I had a Pratchett-esque thought. If a form of porn could be produced without using actual children -- using consenting, young looking adults, writing stories, drawing cartoons , whatever -- and it was proved that the existence of such filth was actually reducing the number of incidents of abuse against children, wouldn't that be a good thing overall? I mean, what parent among you wouldn't french kiss a goat to stop their child from being molested?

    I still think the stuff is vile and disgusting, and I have a few thoughts on some better ways to deal with pedophiles (but they have rights, of course, what a crock of <snip>) but dammit, if it works, why not give it a try? I'd rather some whackjob get his rocks off on this stuff than on a living kid.
     
  3. Aldeth the Foppish Idiot

    Aldeth the Foppish Idiot Armed with My Mallet O' Thinking Veteran

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    12,434
    Media:
    46
    Likes Received:
    250
    Gender:
    Male
    LKD - I think such stuff already DOES exist. I remember that there was a court case a while back addressing just such a thing. Specifically, the court case was regarding actresses who were at least 18, but who looked younger than that, staring in porno films where they stated in the film that they were younger than 18, and whether or not it was legal. IIRC, the ruling was that it was legal, because they really WERE over 18, even though they looked like and stated that they were 14, for example.

    So it would appear that the porn market is ahead of you on this one. Of course, there is a limit to this. It may be possible to take an 18 year old and make her look 14, but it would be really hard to make her look 10. Although who knows? Maybe they can do something like they did for the hobbits in the LotR movies.
     
  4. 8people

    8people 8 is just another way of looking at infinite ★ SPS Account Holder Adored Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2002
    Messages:
    7,141
    Media:
    74
    Likes Received:
    133
    Gender:
    Female
    [​IMG] Didn't Australia retaliate to this by trying to ban small breasts in porn? :D

    If legalizing emulated child pornography satiates the market for it and prevents harm then it should be given serious thought. Though what would the side effects of such a change be? There's a risk that it opens up an avenue for easier access to communities where they can share other pornography that isn't faked, putting it into wider circulation and raising the demand for that too.

    There wouldn't be a sure fire way to ensure no further harm comes of it. Which is the greatest hesitation.
     
Sorcerer's Place is a project run entirely by fans and for fans. Maintaining Sorcerer's Place and a stable environment for all our hosted sites requires a substantial amount of our time and funds on a regular basis, so please consider supporting us to keep the site up & running smoothly. Thank you!

Sorcerers.net is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.