POLL: Iraq: Should the Coalition Stay or Go?

Remove all ads!

Just popping in to say, off topic, to Yago:

The ontological argument, also called Anselm's argument, has been disproven a number of times. Most succinctly, Kant stated: existence is not a predicate.

Probably knew that, but anyways.

Carry on with the attack on America.

 

Of course !

 

Why bother attacking America, when every little slight or disagreement is taken as an affront to everything we claim to stand for? We're hurting ourselves enough as it is. We don't need outside help.

 

The Coalition should let the UN security forces do their job. And regarding the "blood for oil" point of view, think of it this way. 7 huge oil firms have new jobs now. The restauration and the explotation of Iraqi oil. 6 of these firms are from the US. When these firms make money, they have to pay taxes. And who benefits from that? The US goverment....

 

Malaqai -- The problem is that large corporations like Halliburton will be paid with taxpayer money. Just as the American taxpayer paid for the destruction of Iraq, now he/she will be burdened with the cost of rebuilding what Shrub has destroyed. Doesn't sound like a good deal to me. Maybe we should have built some hospitals here in the US that taxpayers could actually afford to go to without having to take out a second mortgage.